The centred rectangle the crop filter receives
Cropping is a geometry problem before it is a video problem. The tool runs FFmpeg over your file once with no output, reads the pixel dimensions out of the stream dump, and from those two numbers plus your chosen ratio it computes a single rectangle: a width, a height, and an x and y offset from the top left corner.
The rule it follows is the largest rectangle at your target ratio that fits inside the source. Compare the source’s own width-to-height ratio against the target. If the source is proportionally wider, the full height is kept and the width is trimmed from both sides. If it is proportionally taller, the full width is kept and the height is trimmed from top and bottom. Whichever edge is the surplus one loses the same amount at each end, which is what keeps the result centred.
Both sides are then rounded down to even numbers, because H.264 rejects odd frame dimensions outright, and the offsets are recalculated from that final size so the rectangle stays centred and never overruns the source. Those four numbers go straight into FFmpeg’s crop filter and nothing else about the framing is negotiable.
Producing the cropped MP4
- Drop your video into the box above, or click Choose a file. MP4, MOV, M4V and WEBM are accepted.
- Set Crop to. Vertical (9:16) for Shorts, Reels, TikTok is the default, with Square (1:1) for feed posts and Widescreen (16:9) for YouTube, landscape as the alternatives.
- Click Crop Video. The dimensions are read first, then the crop and the encode run as a single FFmpeg pass.
- Download the file. It keeps your original name with
-crop-9x16,-crop-1x1or-crop-16x9added and an.mp4extension.
A 1920x1080 clip cropped to 9:16 keeps 608 pixels of width
The numbers are worth seeing before you commit footage to this. Take standard 1080p, 1920 by 1080. Nine-sixteenths of 1080 is 607.5, which rounds to 608 and is already even, so the output frame is 608 by 1080 and the rectangle starts 656 pixels in from the left edge. Two thirds of your image width is gone, permanently.
Square is gentler on the same source: 1080 by 1080, starting 420 pixels in. Going the other way, a portrait 1080 by 1920 phone clip cropped to widescreen gives 1080 by 608, discarding 1312 pixels of height.
None of that is a flaw in the tool, it is simply what changing aspect ratio by cropping means. It also explains why the result is often softer than expected on a platform that expects a tall frame: 608 pixels of width upscaled to fill a modern phone screen has less to work with than the 1080 the platform was hoping for. Starting from higher resolution footage is the only real fix. Aspect Ratio Calculator will work the target dimensions out for you beforehand, and Resize Video is the page to use when the target is a named platform frame rather than a crop, since it standardises the output to a fixed resolution at the ratio you pick and can pad with bars instead of trimming anything away.
CRF 20, AAC audio and the re-encode you cannot skip
Some video edits are free. Rotating a clip can be a metadata flag, and trimming on keyframe boundaries can be a packet copy, which is why Trim Video and Rotate Video can finish almost instantly on a long file. Cropping is not in that family: every frame’s pixels are physically different afterwards, so every frame has to be decoded, filtered and encoded again.
The encode uses libx264 at CRF 20 with the fast preset. CRF 20 is a quality-leaning number rather than a size-leaning one, on the reasoning that you came here to reframe a video and not to compress it. It is still lossy compression, and why re-encoding loses quality sets out what that actually costs on a second generation. The output also carries the faststart flag, so its index sits at the front of the file and a browser or an upload form can read the duration immediately.
Audio follows the source. When the probe finds an audio stream, it is re-encoded to AAC at 128 kbps; when it does not, the encode passes -an and produces a genuinely silent file rather than an empty track.
When the subject sits off to one side
The honest limitation of a centred crop is that it assumes your subject is centred too. An interview shot with the guest framed on the right, a gameplay capture with the minimap in a corner, a webinar recording with slides on one side and a webcam thumbnail on the other: a 9:16 crop of any of those will take the middle and leave the interesting part outside the frame.
There is no repositioning control here, so the practical workflow is to look at the download before you upload it anywhere. If the framing is wrong, the alternatives are re-shooting, editing in a desktop tool that offers a movable crop box, or choosing a less aggressive ratio such as 1:1 that discards less. The rest of the collection, including the tools that pair well with this one, is on the video tools hub.